117. Rule 16 (2) of the Civil Services Examination Rules

A three Judge Bench of the Supreme Court, in CIVIL APPEAL NOS.4310-4311 OF 2010

[Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.13571-72 of 2008] Union of India V. Ramesh Ram & Ors. etc. had referred to the Constitution Bench an important legal question as to whether candidates belonging to reserved category, who get recommended against general/unreserved vacancies on account of their merit (without the benefit of any relaxation/concession), can opt for a higher choice of service earmarked for Reserved Category and thereby migrate to reservation category?

The Constitution Bench on 07/05/2010 setting aside the decision of Madras High Court held that: With regard to the specific characteristics of the UPSC examinations we hold that Reserved Category candidates (belonging to OBC,SC or ST categories among others) who are selected on merit and placed in the list of general/unre served Category candidates can choose to migrate to the respective reserved categories at the time of allocation of services. Such migration is enabled by Rule 16 (2) of the Civil Services Examination Rules, which is not inconsistent with Rule 16 (1) of the same or even the content of Articles 14, 16 (4) and 335 of the Constitution of India.

The Constitution Bench summarized it’s answer as under:

i) MRC candidates who avail the benefit of Rule 16 (2) and adjusted in the reserved category should be counted as part of the reserved pool for the purpose of computing the aggre- gate reservation quotas. The seats vacated by MRC candi- dates in the General Pool will be offered to General category candidates.

ii) By operation of Rule 16 (2), the reserved status of an MRC candidate is protected so that his/ her better perfor-mance does not deny him of the chance to be allotted to a more preferred service.

iii) The amended Rule 16 (2) only seeks to recognize the inter se merit between two classes of candidates i.e. a) meri- torious reserved category candidates b) relatively lower ranked reserved category candidates, for the purpose of al- location to the various Civil Services with due regard for th preferences indicated by them.

iv) The reserved category candidates "belonging to OBC, SC/ ST categories" who are selected on merit and placed in the list of General/Unreserved categorycandidates can choose to migrate to the respective reserved category at the time of allocation of services. Such migration as envisaged by Rule 16 (2) is not inconsistent with Rule 16 (1) or Articles 14, 16 (4) and 335 of the Constitution.

--

Supplement from

Dr. V.N. Tripathi

Haider Ajaz